bright wrote on 03 Jul 2025 04:43:
Dealing with someone who suffers from religious pain is very different than working through false cognitions in therapy for something like depression. In the case of depression, it’s often enough for a fellow sufferer to empathize, and for the therapist to work through the distortions and triggers in a safe, structured way.
But when the pain stems from religious beliefs, I think empathy alone isn’t sufficient. These beliefs often come wrapped in the authority of Torah and spiritual obligation, which makes them feel unchallengeable. For example, if someone believes that Hashem wants them to sit and learn Torah day and night, and that anything less is believed, then yes, we can (and must) empathize. Living with such a demanding and punishing image of Hashem is incredibly painful.
But in my opinion, empathy is only part of it. To really help, we sometimes need to gently offer permission to believe in a different version of Hashem, a compassionate, loving one. This requires some level of intellectual engagement, especially if the person believes this harsh view is Daas Torah, taught to them directly by all the gedolim throughout the generations.
Of course, there’s a fine line between offering healing Torah and giving a full-on shiur klali, which can feel irrelevant or even invalidating. The goal is never to debate (although that's fun too for some), but to open a window, subtly and sensitively, that maybe, just maybe, there’s another way to see things. I believe I may have crossed that line recently, and if so, I apologize.
But I’d really love to hear from the oilam, and from someone in particular (you know who), whether this resonates. And also, where is that line between helpful Torah and a beis midrash-style discussion? How do we offer clarity without sounding like we’re trying to “prove” something?
Bright, your first point about differentiating between religious trauma versus other false cognitions is
spot on, I appreciated your highlighting of this distinction.
When emotional issues that arise are rooted in the misinterpretation of religion, there is often a profound struggle of the mind, sometimes leading to debilitating inner confusion.
And while gently offering permission to believe another perspective, which is technically
primarily an intellectual adjustment, is absolutely essential, nevertheless it can be more complex than that. Because sometimes, the
emotional damage is constantly blocking out new perspectives.
For example: If one was led to believe in an unhealthy, unbalanced view of Hashem as being a "high-demand G-d", although of course Hashem always wants us to do better, reach higher, and grow, if it is
disproportionately harped on, than we lose the value that we should have of ourselves, our own Avodah. We lose the inner sippuk that is the fuel for further healthy growth, because we live in the constant neurotic shadow of a consistently disapproving G-d. It is an intellectual shift to adjust that to a more balanced perspective, yes. But emotions of shame and guilt, deeply ingrained inner voices of criticism, and the depression and paralysis that results, are going to give battle to those new perspectives.
So is it just about new perspectives? Or are there deeper emotional issues? And were those issues there beforehand, and negative religious experience simply "added fuel to the fire", or were these emotional issues a
direct result of that negative experience?
Was the negative spiritual experience primarily based on unhealthy, toxic misinterpretation? Or was it
predatory in nature, using religion to foster dependency, to control, to assert power and inflict pain?
So now I am looking back at this very professional sounding megillah before I hit submit, and I guess what I am saying, in an awfully long-winded ramble, is I DON'T KNOW! Maybe the solutions are far more complex than we would like them to be. Seems like
Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore was kind of saying the same thing.
What are your thoughts?