Welcome, Guest

Religious pain
(0 viewing) 
Welcome to our forum! Introduce yourself here (anonymously, of course) and get a warm welcome from the rest of the community!

TOPIC: Religious pain 3895 Views

Re: Religious pain 03 Jul 2025 04:43 #438379

  • bright
  • Current streak: 241 days
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 649
  • Karma: 30

I’d like to be vulnerable as well; vulnerability breeds vulnerability

I believe to a degree, I knew that this would start a debate, I was being pretty controversial, and maybe that's what I wanted. I enjoy a good back-and-forth. I apologize if you or anyone was hurt because of this. This leads to the following dillema.
Maybe you can help me with this, YKW.

Dealing with someone who suffers from religious pain is very different than working through false cognitions in therapy for something like depression. In the case of depression, it’s often enough for a fellow sufferer to empathize, and for the therapist to work through the distortions and triggers in a safe, structured way.

But when the pain stems from religious beliefs, I think empathy alone isn’t sufficient. These beliefs often come wrapped in the authority of Torah and spiritual obligation, which makes them feel unchallengeable. For example, if someone believes that Hashem wants them to sit and learn Torah day and night, and that anything less is believed, then yes, we can (and must) empathize. Living with such a demanding and punishing image of Hashem is incredibly painful.

But in my opinion, empathy is only part of it. To really help, we sometimes need to gently offer permission to believe in a different version of Hashem, a compassionate, loving one. This requires some level of intellectual engagement, especially if the person believes this harsh view is Daas Torah, taught to them directly by all the gedolim throughout the generations.

Of course, there’s a fine line between offering healing Torah and giving a full-on shiur klali, which can feel irrelevant or even invalidating. The goal is never to debate (although that's fun too for some), but to open a window, subtly and sensitively, that maybe, just maybe, there’s another way to see things. I believe I may have crossed that line recently, and if so, I apologize.

But I’d really love to hear from the oilam, and from someone in particular (you know who), whether this resonates. And also, where is that line between helpful Torah and a beis midrash-style discussion? How do we offer clarity without sounding like we’re trying to “prove” something?

Nothing good grows in the dark. 
Last Edit: 03 Jul 2025 04:48 by bright.

Re: Religious pain 03 Jul 2025 05:50 #438383

  • SisonYishecha
  • Current streak: 36 days
  • OFFLINE
  • Gold Boarder
  • Posts: 191
  • Karma: 12
Great point.

I've found (personally and with Talmidim) that validation, understanding (real emotional understanding), and acceptance are safe and effective tools.

Re: Religious pain 03 Jul 2025 13:30 #438390

  • BenHashemBH
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 1151
  • Karma: 41
bright wrote on 03 Jul 2025 04:43:

we sometimes need to gently offer permission to believe in a different version of Hashem, a compassionate, loving one.


My Brother, I think we all need this.
You can't really instruct someone how to love. They could go through the motions, but that doesn't mean they feel anything. Someone has to help them learn where to look, and then they can hopefully find that relationship you speak of. Taking away pain but living comatose is still a pretty desolate existence. Removing (or lessening) an inhibitor is meaningful when it results in a path forward, in leaving a space for progress. I can also live while bringing that pain with me, or some of it, if I can figure that out. We all do that already, to varying degrees. 
What I hope I'm sort of saying is that living isn't a bonus that follows not dying - living is the whole point.

open a window, subtly and sensitively, that maybe, just maybe, there’s another way to see things.


Opening my eyes won't allow me to see anything if the window is shut. Neither will opening the window help me much if my eyes remain closed. You need both AND there has to be something to see. If I don't figure out and feel what G-d looks like for me, then everything falls short. 

It's not my place to speak about trauma, abuse, or anything of the sort. I'm not intending to answer or solve anyone's past CV. All I mean it say is that what you are ultimately looking for is something that everyone needs to discover. How to do that, each person must find their own way.

I don't know if I'm even making sense. These feelings are difficult to try and put into words. Life hurts and then you die is pretty horrible. Life doesn't hurt and then you die is only slightly better. Life is what it is, but I lived - that's what I need to figure out.

Today is yesterday's tomorrow.
The yetzarim a person has the most trouble dealing with are his most powerful God-given tools for developing his potential and achieving shleimus.
It doesn't matter how big the number is, only that today it is going up by one.
There is no "just" when it comes to lust.

Please feel free to reach out. I'd appreciate connecting with you (via GYE, email, or phone - whatever floats your boat)
A little about me: guardyoureyes.com/forum/19-Introduce-Yourself/412971-I-Want-to-Help-Others
Last Edit: 03 Jul 2025 14:09 by BenHashemBH.

Re: Religious pain 03 Jul 2025 17:40 #438405

  • bright
  • Current streak: 241 days
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 649
  • Karma: 30
Precisely my point. Yes the person will have to internalize it. But like the Satmar Ruv said a machlokes lsheim shomayim sofo lehiskayem, if each party is saying their doing it leshem shomayim that fight will never end. If one believes that this is just how it is and doesn't know or isn't introduced to other possibilities it can be an exercise in futility to help them feel better. What would you say if someone told you, "Life is supposed to be miserable, Im a bal aveira."?
Nothing good grows in the dark. 

Re: Religious pain 03 Jul 2025 17:46 #438407

  • yitzchokm
  • Current streak: 612 days
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 924
  • Karma: 60
If you are talking about someone OTD the first thing is validation and love. Their struggles with Yiddishkeit are usually secondary to their struggles with life which are usually because of the way they were treated by others. If you are talking about someone who isn't OTD then it is validation and encouragement as we frequently do on the forum.
Last Edit: 03 Jul 2025 17:49 by yitzchokm.

Re: Religious pain 03 Jul 2025 18:33 #438408

  • alex94
  • Current streak: 187 days
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 107
שמונה פרקים לרמב"ם ד
ואתה יודע שאדון הראשונים והאחרונים: משה רבנו, ע"ה, כבר אמר אליו השם יתברך: "יען לא האמנתם בי להקדישני לעיני בני ישראל" "על אשר מריתם
את פי למי מריבה" "על אשר לא קדשתם אותי בתוך בני ישראל" וחטאו ע"ה הוא שנטה לצד אחד מן הקצוות ממעלת המידות, והיא: הסבלנות. כאשר נטה לצד הרגזנות באמרו: "שמעו נא המורים", דקדק עליו השם יתברך: שיהיה אדם כמוהו כועס לפני עדת ישראל במקום שאין ראוי בו הכעס... וכאשר ראוהו שכעס, אמרו: שהוא, ע"ה, ודאי אין לו פחיתות מידה, ולולא שהיה יודע שהשם יתברך כעס עלינו בבקשת המים ושאנחנחו הכעסנוהו, יתברך, לא היה כועס - ואנו לא מצינו שהשם יתברך כעס בדברו אליו בזה הענין, אבל אמר: "קח את המטה והקהל את העדה" וגו

The Rambam is Shmona Perakim explains that sin of Moshe in this weeks Parsha was that the Yidden understood from his anger that Hashem was angry at them when he in fact wasn't.
What a message of responsibility to every Mechanech, Rebbi and parent. The student or child naturally places the teacher or parent on a pedestal, therefore seeing them as a representing Hashem and the Torah. When anger comes the students way, even if not expressly in the name of, it effects their perception of who Hashem is and what the Torah means.
Last Edit: 03 Jul 2025 18:34 by alex94.

Re: Religious pain 03 Jul 2025 22:15 #438429

  • chaimoigen
  • Current streak: 780 days
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 1632
  • Karma: 159
bright wrote on 03 Jul 2025 04:43:

I’d like to be vulnerable as well; vulnerability breeds vulnerability

I believe to a degree, I knew that this would start a debate, I was being pretty controversial, and maybe that's what I wanted. I enjoy a good back-and-forth. I apologize if you or anyone was hurt because of this. This leads to the following dillema.
Maybe you can help me with this, YKW.

Dealing with someone who suffers from religious pain is very different than working through false cognitions in therapy for something like depression. In the case of depression, it’s often enough for a fellow sufferer to empathize, and for the therapist to work through the distortions and triggers in a safe, structured way.

But when the pain stems from religious beliefs, I think empathy alone isn’t sufficient. These beliefs often come wrapped in the authority of Torah and spiritual obligation, which makes them feel unchallengeable. For example, if someone believes that Hashem wants them to sit and learn Torah day and night, and that anything less is believed, then yes, we can (and must) empathize. Living with such a demanding and punishing image of Hashem is incredibly painful.

But in my opinion, empathy is only part of it. To really help, we sometimes need to gently offer permission to believe in a different version of Hashem, a compassionate, loving one. This requires some level of intellectual engagement, especially if the person believes this harsh view is Daas Torah, taught to them directly by all the gedolim throughout the generations.

Of course, there’s a fine line between offering healing Torah and giving a full-on shiur klali, which can feel irrelevant or even invalidating. The goal is never to debate (although that's fun too for some), but to open a window, subtly and sensitively, that maybe, just maybe, there’s another way to see things. I believe I may have crossed that line recently, and if so, I apologize.

But I’d really love to hear from the oilam, and from someone in particular (you know who), whether this resonates. And also, where is that line between helpful Torah and a beis midrash-style discussion? How do we offer clarity without sounding like we’re trying to “prove” something?


Spot on, brother. 
You are accentuating the difficulty of the sensitive balancing/juggling act that you are asking those of those who are capable of trying to bridge the "gap" you spoke of in your original post. Not simple to find the delicate balance while being supportive, sensitive and empathetic. 

It's a lot easier to merely empathize, but it often wont truly help the person. Pointing out distortions, opening up new ideas, all without lecturing and allthewhile trying to preserve dignity and exercise care, gently showing the right way without repeating the mistakes of those that went before, all this without truly knowing what the guy is dealing with, because he hasn't opened up fully .... it aint easy.

It's easier to give up without trying, especially if you don't want to do any harm inadvertently...    
But doing what's easier hasn't helped anyone lately...

Real life usually doesnt have easy answers. 

Thanks for being a Bright spot in a world that's often full of shadows. 
chaimoigen
Please feel free to reach out anytime at chaim.oigen@gmail.com

Perhaps you'd enjoy seeing Chaim's Oigen
Last Edit: 03 Jul 2025 22:17 by chaimoigen.

Re: Religious pain 04 Jul 2025 01:04 #438439

  • bright
  • Current streak: 241 days
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 649
  • Karma: 30
alex94 wrote on 03 Jul 2025 18:33:
שמונה פרקים לרמב"ם ד
ואתה יודע שאדון הראשונים והאחרונים: משה רבנו, ע"ה, כבר אמר אליו השם יתברך: "יען לא האמנתם בי להקדישני לעיני בני ישראל" "על אשר מריתם
את פי למי מריבה" "על אשר לא קדשתם אותי בתוך בני ישראל" וחטאו ע"ה הוא שנטה לצד אחד מן הקצוות ממעלת המידות, והיא: הסבלנות. כאשר נטה לצד הרגזנות באמרו: "שמעו נא המורים", דקדק עליו השם יתברך: שיהיה אדם כמוהו כועס לפני עדת ישראל במקום שאין ראוי בו הכעס... וכאשר ראוהו שכעס, אמרו: שהוא, ע"ה, ודאי אין לו פחיתות מידה, ולולא שהיה יודע שהשם יתברך כעס עלינו בבקשת המים ושאנחנחו הכעסנוהו, יתברך, לא היה כועס - ואנו לא מצינו שהשם יתברך כעס בדברו אליו בזה הענין, אבל אמר: "קח את המטה והקהל את העדה" וגו

The Rambam is Shmona Perakim explains that sin of Moshe in this weeks Parsha was that the Yidden understood from his anger that Hashem was angry at them when he in fact wasn't.
What a message of responsibility to every Mechanech, Rebbi and parent. The student or child naturally places the teacher or parent on a pedestal, therefore seeing them as a representing Hashem and the Torah. When anger comes the students way, even if not expressly in the name of, it effects their perception of who Hashem is and what the Torah means.

That is an amazing source! Really powerful in understanding myself and my responsibility to others...
Nothing good grows in the dark. 

Re: Religious pain 04 Jul 2025 01:06 #438440

  • bright
  • Current streak: 241 days
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 649
  • Karma: 30
chaimoigen wrote on 03 Jul 2025 22:15:

bright wrote on 03 Jul 2025 04:43:

I’d like to be vulnerable as well; vulnerability breeds vulnerability

I believe to a degree, I knew that this would start a debate, I was being pretty controversial, and maybe that's what I wanted. I enjoy a good back-and-forth. I apologize if you or anyone was hurt because of this. This leads to the following dillema.
Maybe you can help me with this, YKW.

Dealing with someone who suffers from religious pain is very different than working through false cognitions in therapy for something like depression. In the case of depression, it’s often enough for a fellow sufferer to empathize, and for the therapist to work through the distortions and triggers in a safe, structured way.

But when the pain stems from religious beliefs, I think empathy alone isn’t sufficient. These beliefs often come wrapped in the authority of Torah and spiritual obligation, which makes them feel unchallengeable. For example, if someone believes that Hashem wants them to sit and learn Torah day and night, and that anything less is believed, then yes, we can (and must) empathize. Living with such a demanding and punishing image of Hashem is incredibly painful.

But in my opinion, empathy is only part of it. To really help, we sometimes need to gently offer permission to believe in a different version of Hashem, a compassionate, loving one. This requires some level of intellectual engagement, especially if the person believes this harsh view is Daas Torah, taught to them directly by all the gedolim throughout the generations.

Of course, there’s a fine line between offering healing Torah and giving a full-on shiur klali, which can feel irrelevant or even invalidating. The goal is never to debate (although that's fun too for some), but to open a window, subtly and sensitively, that maybe, just maybe, there’s another way to see things. I believe I may have crossed that line recently, and if so, I apologize.

But I’d really love to hear from the oilam, and from someone in particular (you know who), whether this resonates. And also, where is that line between helpful Torah and a beis midrash-style discussion? How do we offer clarity without sounding like we’re trying to “prove” something?


Spot on, brother. 
You are accentuating the difficulty of the sensitive balancing/juggling act that you are asking those of those who are capable of trying to bridge the "gap" you spoke of in your original post. Not simple to find the delicate balance while being supportive, sensitive and empathetic. 

It's a lot easier to merely empathize, but it often wont truly help the person. Pointing out distortions, opening up new ideas, all without lecturing and allthewhile trying to preserve dignity and exercise care, gently showing the right way without repeating the mistakes of those that went before, all this without truly knowing what the guy is dealing with, because he hasn't opened up fully .... it aint easy.

It's easier to give up without trying, especially if you don't want to do any harm inadvertently...    
But doing what's easier hasn't helped anyone lately...

Real life usually doesnt have easy answers. 

Thanks for being a Bright spot in a world that's often full of shadows. 
chaimoigen

It definitely helps, especially when you give it:) But for real healing to start, yes, we have to take some risks...
Nothing good grows in the dark. 

Re: Religious pain 04 Jul 2025 14:54 #438459

  • youknowwho
  • OFFLINE
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 663
  • Karma: 107
bright wrote on 03 Jul 2025 04:43:

Dealing with someone who suffers from religious pain is very different than working through false cognitions in therapy for something like depression. In the case of depression, it’s often enough for a fellow sufferer to empathize, and for the therapist to work through the distortions and triggers in a safe, structured way.

But when the pain stems from religious beliefs, I think empathy alone isn’t sufficient. These beliefs often come wrapped in the authority of Torah and spiritual obligation, which makes them feel unchallengeable. For example, if someone believes that Hashem wants them to sit and learn Torah day and night, and that anything less is believed, then yes, we can (and must) empathize. Living with such a demanding and punishing image of Hashem is incredibly painful.

But in my opinion, empathy is only part of it. To really help, we sometimes need to gently offer permission to believe in a different version of Hashem, a compassionate, loving one. This requires some level of intellectual engagement, especially if the person believes this harsh view is Daas Torah, taught to them directly by all the gedolim throughout the generations.

Of course, there’s a fine line between offering healing Torah and giving a full-on shiur klali, which can feel irrelevant or even invalidating. The goal is never to debate (although that's fun too for some), but to open a window, subtly and sensitively, that maybe, just maybe, there’s another way to see things. I believe I may have crossed that line recently, and if so, I apologize.

But I’d really love to hear from the oilam, and from someone in particular (you know who), whether this resonates. And also, where is that line between helpful Torah and a beis midrash-style discussion? How do we offer clarity without sounding like we’re trying to “prove” something?


Bright, your first point about differentiating between religious trauma versus other false cognitions is spot on, I appreciated your highlighting of this distinction. 

When emotional issues that arise are rooted in the misinterpretation of religion, there is often a profound struggle of the mind, sometimes leading to debilitating inner confusion. 

And while gently offering permission to believe another perspective, which is technically primarily an intellectual adjustment, is absolutely essential, nevertheless it can be more complex than that. Because sometimes, the emotional damage is constantly blocking out new perspectives.  

For example: If one was led to believe in an unhealthy, unbalanced view of Hashem as being a "high-demand G-d", although of course Hashem always wants us to do better, reach higher, and grow, if it is disproportionately harped on, than we lose the value that we should have of ourselves, our own Avodah. We lose the inner sippuk that is the fuel for further healthy growth, because we live in the constant neurotic shadow of a consistently disapproving G-d. It is an intellectual shift to adjust that to a more balanced perspective, yes. But emotions of shame and guilt, deeply ingrained inner voices of criticism, and the depression and paralysis that results, are going to give battle to those new perspectives. 

So is it just about new perspectives? Or are there deeper emotional issues? And were those issues there beforehand, and negative religious experience simply "added fuel to the fire", or were these emotional issues a direct result of that negative experience?

Was the negative spiritual experience primarily based on unhealthy, toxic misinterpretation? Or was it predatory in nature, using religion to foster dependency, to control, to assert power and inflict pain? 

So now I am looking back at this very professional sounding megillah before I hit submit, and I guess what I am saying, in an awfully long-winded ramble, is I DON'T KNOW! Maybe the solutions are far more complex than we would like them to be. Seems like Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore was kind of saying the same thing. 

What are your thoughts? 
Moderators: dov, cordnoy, the.guard, mendygye
Time to create page: 0.65 seconds

Are you sure?

Yes