OTR wrote on 02 Apr 2019 00:37:
It's been my personal experience as well as that of many on the forum that utilizing Torah and mussar to address and addictive personality is akin to using a drill to bake. Wrong tool for the job. It's not a lack of yiras shomayim. It's an illness of the mind. Are you new here? This is pretty standard knowledge amongst addicts.
For practical purposes, not for the sake of a philosophical argument- Markz used to, and maybe still does, have a long list of people who succeeded in being sober after a long time. Many who were told, who thought, or who said, that they were addicts.
I went through most if not all of them when I rejoined, and I saw a crazy thing. Many addicts learned they weren’t addicts or got downgraded, and the variety of ways that people became sober was almost as varied as the names of the people.
And yes, some used religion and Mussar. So while I think most of us here agree that Mussar won’t cure true addicts (whatever that means), there is so much variety of definition, and so much variety to who succeeds around here, that I wouldn’t dismiss any method outright.
AlexEliezer, I believe, cured himself through some method with the Arizal’s teachings and some other things.
I, a former twelve stepper, succeeded for long periods of time by learning that Shmiras Einayim and staying away from triggers works.
So so by all means, if someone is recommending something that you think is detrimental, stop them.
But otherwise, I don’t know if you can assume as fact that it doesn’t work.
And as for the disease model of addiction-it’s one model, and plenty a controversial model. See the Rat Park video, read Stanton Peele and Gabor Mate, and you’ll see that it’s not a given either.
(And Dov will tell you that it doesn’t work for the addicts, but that way too many people think they are addicts, and that for those people it might indeed work. )