Ben492 wrote on 06 Dec 2011 05:10:
Why do you think you have an addiction? I don't think you have an addiction. Just because you find it hard to stop does not mean it is an addiction.
This may seem like nitpicking, but it isn't. The way you should deal with it is vastly different if it is an addiction.
I think you should focus on the fact that since it is very hard for you, especially since you are used to doing it, and started when you were very young, that G-d is probably not extremely angry about it. And that G-d still loves you, and wants the best for you.
And that when someone loves you, they love you even if you have done something bad or embarrassing. And that G-d still wants to have a relationship with you even if you are doing this and will continue to do it.
Dear Ben,
First, where did you ever get the idea that G-d does not love an addict as much as he loves anyone else? I see that He loves an addict probably even
more than he loves many other people, simply because: look at where he has brought so many of us and our families! Clearly he decided to guide them to recovery
while they were still on their knees in some bathroom somewhere masturbating to their porn - and he loved us desperate perverts enough
right then to help us find what we really wanted: recovery and the
good life!
The ongoing miracle that He has done for the families of five guys can introduce you to, who I personally know started on GYE and eventually found real recovery, is amazing. New lives for them, for their wives, and for their children; freedom one day at a time from porn obsession - and from what is even more tragic than than porn obsession: fighting porn obsession. The self-centered, pseudo-religious romance that many addicts (and non-addicts) cling to in the 'valiant struggle' against
their own lust is sad to witness.
G-d
certainly loves the sex addict a lot,
even before he or she starts to recover.
Second, why should it matter whether He is "extremely angry about it", or not? If a person loses all the money they have, do they react by throwing their possessions out the window? No. They try their best to build with what they've got, to do the best with what they've got and at least live poorly. It beats dying of hunger.
So let's say I am destined for a lot of gehinnom for all the thousands of times I had sex with myself and all the acting out I did with women real and imagined...so? Therefore what? Does any real person actually throw in the towel? Is all lost? Or do we do the best we can with what we have, from here on? The s'forim are
full of resho'im who made good,
even without evidence of any significant teshuvah! Posul? No one is posul to my G-d. Maybe to yours, but not to mine. Even lu yetzuyar that I am considered in Shomayim to be a true rosho,
He even has a role for me in His Will. Just like you and all the other earthlings.
Would I throw all my furniture and clothes to the street because I lost my job and all my savings? No. Would I turn my back on my birthright as a human and as a Jew simply because of a stain I may be carrying - no matter how ugly it may be? No.
Finally, I agree 100% that just because a guy (or gal) likes to act out their lust and has a hard time staying quit
does not mean they are addicts. I agree that the steps an addict is forced to take are vastly different than those a normal tempted person needs to take - and you wrote it so well.
But
who said this man is an addict, but himself? Who are you or I to argue? I feel strongly that most of the people here are not addicts, at all, at least as I understand the meaning of the word. Normal people are not powerless, I believe. But some here most certainly
are addicts, and they
will not get better by wishing it away, by getting more self-esteem, or by "Teshuvah". But who are you or I to try to convince any person one way or the other?
Of course, if one is sincerely concerned that the label 'addict' means that G-d probably can't really love me, and/or that a sweet and good life is impossible now, then I can understand why they'd want to do people the favor of dissuading them of the idea that they are addicts.
Maybe you share my faith that those who really
are addicts will, in the end, be forced to discover it. Maybe it is risky business. But, as with many mental illnesses, where do we draw the line and start allowing people to take the label?
I am not arguing, but rather, asking.
Thanks,
Dov