Search results ({{ res.total }}):

Lust in Marriage

Is Lust a Problem in Marriage?

Thursday, 09 February 2012

Someone sent in a question:

I have a question for you. I'm trying to stop lusting for people in the streets, etc. but do I also have to give up the lust that I have towards my wife?

(Note: although Boruch's answer below is a bit long, it is well worth your while to carefully read and even re-read the quotes that Boruch brings below from the White-Book of SA. If you are married, it can change your entire perspective and give you a much deeper understanding of what exactly it is that we are trying to "break free" of. If you don't have time to read it now, perhaps print it out to read later).


Boruch answers:

You're right on target. Natural desire is fine, but lust, even in marriage, is a serious problem for the lust addict and can be fatal.

What is the difference between natural sexual desire and the sexual desire that we (in SA) call lust?

The natural desire for sex is a desire to encourage us to have children, to encourage us to naturally give love to our wives, rather than taking love from our wives, and to enhance our relationships with our wives and bring us closer together. That is not what we call "lust" in SA. However, that very same desire for sex with one's wife used selfishly and self-centeredly to make ourselves feel better and to "drug" on, is most certainly a problem.

In AA's "Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions" (p. 42) there is a great piece on instincts:

"Creation gave us instincts for a purpose. Without them we wouldn't be complete human beings. If men and women didn't exert themselves to be secure in their persons, made no effort to harvest food or construct shelter, there wouldn't be any survival. If they didn't reproduce the earth wouldn't be populated. If there were no social instinct, if man cared nothing for the society of one another, there would be no society, So these desires for the sex relation, for material and emotional security, and for companionship are perfectly necessary and right, and surely God-given.

Yet these instincts, so necessary for our existence, often far exceed their proper functions. Powerfully, blindly, many times subtly, they drive us, dominate us, and insist upon ruling our lives. Our desires for sex, for material and emotional security, and for an important place in society often tyrannize us. When thus out of joint, man's natural desires cause him great trouble, practically all the trouble there is. No human being, however good, is exempt from these troubles. Nearly every serious emotional problem can be seen as a case of misdirected instinct. When that happens, our great natural assets, the instincts, have turned into physical and mental liabilities."

SA's White Book (p. 40) makes the point powerfully and practically when it comes to sex:

"... sex is a natural function... The real problem of this addiction seems to be what we call lust - an attitude demanding that a natural instinct serve unnatural desires. When we try to use sex to reduce isolation, loneliness, insecurity, fear, tension, or to cover our emotions, make us feel alive, help us escape, or satisfy our God-hunger, we create an unnatural appetite that misuses and abuses the natural instinct. It is not only more intense than the natural but becomes something totally different... sex enters a different dimension; ... it takes on an unnatural spiritual component."

And the White Book takes the point further (on p. 41):

"What Is Lust? ... A Personal Point of View...

Lust is not sex, and it is not physical. It seems to be a screen of self-indulgent fantasy separating me from reality - either the reality of my own person (in sex with myself) or the reality of my spouse. It works the same way whether with a girlfriend, a prostitute, or my wife. It thus negates identity, either mine or the other person's, and is anti-real, working against my own reality, working against me.

I can't have true union with my wife while lust is active because she as a person really doesn't matter; she's even in the way; she's merely the sexual instrument... With lust, the sex act is not the result of personal union; sex doesn't flow from that union. Sex energized by lust makes true union impossible...

... Seen in this light, lust can exist apart from sex. Indeed, there are those who say they are obsessed with lust who can no longer have sex. In my experience, lust is not physical; it is not even strong sexual desire. It seems to be a spiritual force that distorts my instincts; and whenever let loose in one area, seems to want to infect other areas as well...

Therefore, my basic problem as a recovering sexaholic is to live free from my lust. When I entertain it in any form, sooner or later it tries to express itself in every form. And lust becomes the indicator of not only what I do, but what I am.

But there is great hope here. By surrendering lust and its acting out each time I'm tempted by it, and then experiencing God's life-giving deliverance from its power, recovery and healing are taking place, and wholeness is being restored - true union within myself first, then with others and the Source of my life.



And the White Book puts it most powerfully here (on p. 192):

"Of course, we recognize that one can be sexually "dry" but not sober from lust or dependency. The "dry drunk" syndrome (being technically sober but having all the problems and misery of the "drunk") discovered in AA, applies to us as well, single or married... The real problem for all of us (single, married, man, woman, from whatever lifestyle) is one and the same: the spiritual misconnection...

... Physical sobriety is not an end in itself but a means toward an end - victory over the obsession and progress in recovery. We are often the only ones who know on the inside of our souls whether we are truly in sobriety and recovery. (It is also possible we can be fooling ourselves.) Better to acknowledge where we really are than hide behind the badge of our sobriety date, cheat ourselves, and threaten our union with one another.

The fact that marrieds can have sex with their spouse and call themselves "sober" is no advantage at all. It can even work against recovery. Some marrieds confess that even though they aren't "acting out" any more, victory over lust still eludes them. As a matter of fact, it often seems harder for marrieds to get victory over lust and dependency unless they go through the experience of total sexual abstinence. And more often than we might suppose, marrieds can be heard complaining that singles have it easier! Let's face it: sexaholics (recovering or not, single or married) can expect to have problems with sex! (Not to mention the host of other problems entailed in trying to live with and relate to others).

What we strive toward is not only the negative sobriety of not acting out our sexaholism, but progressive victory over the obsession in the looking and thinking.We also strive toward the positive sobriety of acting out true union of persons. The great blessing (or curse, as the case may be) of our condition is that unless and until we can give unconditionally and relate with others, the vacuum left inside us from withdrawal will never be filled. All along, we had thought we could make the Connection by taking; we see now that we get it by giving. Our whole concept of sex begins to change. Sex finds a simple and natural place it could never have before and becomes merely one of the things that flows from true union in committed marriage. And even here, we've discovered that sex is optional."

This is how the founder of SA described recovery in his marriage:

"Healing in my marriage and in the family is one of the most blessed areas of this new life, even though things aren't always a bed of roses. I've found something better than lust - reality. But I have to be willing to give up any thought of changing partners, either actually or in fantasy, even if it means not having sex at all. Each time, I have to surrender my right to sex and depend on the grace of God. What else can you call it? And there are times my wife and I have gone without sex for extended periods. But it's all right; sex is optional now. I have a choice. And mutually voluntary periods of abstinence for a year or so have proven to be the most constructive-and happy-times of our entire marriage. For me the key was finally giving up all expectation of either sex or affection, and working on myself and my defective relations with others.

It has been a totally new beginning for us. I'm just starting to get acquainted with my wife of seventeen years. I discover to my delight she's a person: unique, independent, an individual, a whole universe of personality I was blind to before. And the more I die to any thought of resorting to someone else and commit myself to this one union, the more pleasure and love and freedom I find.

I can't believe that the person I'm writing about today is the same one who used to think and do the things I've been describing. Actually, that other person was a slave; he was living in a world of fantasy and illusion, only for himself, and always alone. He had never matured through emotional adolescence and was spiritually dead. He could not cope either with his own emotions or with life in the big world out there, and was constantly running. Running to satisfy demands and lusts that could never be satisfied. Running from who he really was; running from others; running from life; running from God, the source of his life.

The running is over. I've found what I was really looking for.

Single page